Thoughts on Septuagenarian Status
Achieving
septuagenarian status is a marker that should occasion gratitude and thanks. To observe the attainment of my three score
and ten, Anita and I were at Symphony Hall two nights ago to experience Bach’s
Mass in B Minor, music so transcendent that it is, as
maestro Muti avers, one of the proofs of the existence of God. Today we’ll be at a bookstore author signing;
and then dinner at a restaurant that is not McDonald’s. This weekend the family will gather by the
river in the Quad cities to celebrate not only my 70th but also Daughter
the Elder’s launching of her own law practice.
In addition we will attend a concert where Daughter the Younger will step
out from her chorus to bathe us with a solo performance of “Balm in Gilead.” And throughout all these activities, providing
counterpoint, will be the effusive and beguiling babble of seventeen-month-old-granddaughter,
Kinley Clare. All told, it would seem
that I am I blessed, bounteously so!
However, there is no gainsaying the reality
that I am now placed squarely in the starting gate of the “decade in which most
of us die.” And it is vaguely
unsettling. As the Simon and Garfunkel
tune, “Old Friends,” intones, “How terribly strange to be seventy.”
I am on guard
for requests from family and friends to check my vital signs. I know that the best dramatic reading I can
offer this weekend will not be literary passages, poems and such; instead, on
this occasion those near and dear will attend carefully to a reading of the
will. You have to expect a reordering of
priorities of your “own ones” when you develop cracks and fissures, for an old
man is like “a tattered coat upon a stick.”
On this
birthday morning, Anita presented me with a beautifully framed diptych. Two pictures of me. The first when I was one, the other at present. My mind turned back to an object I found in
our house when I was a boy. A small
bellows. I thought it was a toy. But it was explained to me that it was for
the fireplace, to help the kindling catch, to fan the flames. I was
fascinated by it. I liked to mess with
it when the fireplace was not in use, and watch when it served its purpose to aid
domestic warming. I later learned the
word “bellow,” and was intrigued by the fructive lexical closeness of these two
words. Since a bellows “fans the flames”
and a bellow assures hearing, I found the gestalt of melding both effects to
equal a core value in my life. So from
this birthday on, I have two choices, both of them embodied in the compelling
figure of Lear, Shakespeare’s aging king, who towers over all even as he
totters through his final days. At the
beginning of the play, Lear divests himself of his holdings in an attempt “to
shake all cares and business from our age, / Conferring them on younger
strengths, while we/ Unburthened crawl toward death.” But Lear is also the master of the
bellow. For example, to Goneril and
Regan who seek to strip him of his retinue on the putative grounds that he no
longer has any necessity for followers: “O reason not the need!/ Our basest
beggars/ Are in the poorest thing superfluous. / Allow not nature more than
nature needs, / Man’s life is cheap as beast’s. . . . ----I will do such
things----/ What they are, yet I know not; but they shall be/ The terrors of
the earth.” And in the most famous caterwaul, his
apostrophe to the storm upon the heath, he defies nature itself: “Blow winds, and crack your cheeks. Rage, blow! / You cataracts and hurricanoes,
spout/ Till you have drenched our steeples, drowned the cocks. . . . Here I
stand your slave, / A poor, infirm, weak and despised old man. / But yet I call
you servile ministers . . .
It is from King
Lear (certainly not from Hamlet) that I have learned to believe in
the bellow. Extremely quiet people are not to be entirely trusted. I regard
them as more suspicious than auspicious.
A loud utterance, often in the interrogative, has an immediate
purpose. For example, “Are you in the house?” It is surprising that even when only two
people live together in an upstairs/downstairs abode, you can be unsure whether
the other is above or below, or has slipped out unbeknownst. The bellow is not a plaintive cry or a
forlorn lament, such as “Why me, Lord?”
It has a practical purpose. And
it is not only an old person’s tool. For
example, it is useful for parents and other adults tasked with forming the
young: “Have you cleaned up your room?”
or “Is it possible for you to look up
from that screen?” But the bellow takes
on an added richness in aging. And Lear
is not alone in wielding it. At the
other end of the nobility scale, remember Willy Loman in Death of a
Salesman: “The woods are burning
boys . . .” and, “A man is not a
piece of fruit! In poetry, the
bellow has a proud tradition and many will recall Dylan Thomas’ exhortation to
his father, “Rage, rage against the
dying of the light.” But there is
something askew in the poet’s imperative here.
You really cannot bellow on behalf of another. Voice your own stentorian declamation. Upbraid, denounce, laud, endorse, or shout
with joy, but make your presence known.
If the hortatory urging to follow your dream leaves you flat, try the elixir
of unleashing well phrased condemnation.
Make noxious noise. So long as it
scans or has a lilt to it, you’ll leave the world (probably in your eighth
decade) all the better for having fanned the flames.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home