Literary Leavings (1)
Ø In an
elegant French film about female empowerment set on the isle of Corsica, one adult
character gives the novel Martin Eden
to another; and it’s later referenced in a conversation with a daughter. The
protagonist is a person who improves his lot from his working-class background,
and so there’s a rough parallel with character development in the film. But I
was distracted because I couldn’t retrieve the author’s name from the senior
sieve of memory, a minor pesterment throughout the viewing. (I had two names in my head; at least one proved
to be correct--Jack London.) The film? Queen To Play. And it’s a gem. Even if you’re not
particularly interested in chess, your time is better spent watching this movie
than reading anything by Jack London.
Ø “Tandem
reading”—two volumes of two poets at the same time—is especially pleasurable with
poetry. I like to pair poets as
different as night and day. For example,
Philip Larkin and Billy Collins. I popped awhile back for the pricey 2012 hardcover
of Larkin’s The Complete Poems, and found myself chuckling over the minutia
within the scholarly introduction; e.g., the new edition cites the need for its
publication because the previous collection (1988) by a different editor “contains
72 errors of wording, 47 of punctuation, 8 of letter case, 5 of word-division,
4 of font, and three of format.” 8 I’ll spare you the gloss that the
superscript points to lest you be led to stupefaction. Nonetheless, I would
regard it as a point well taken that this is the price we pay for a reliable,
clean copy text. What the reader wants,
however, is the poem itself, the sound and sense of it, the acerbity of “This
Be The Verse,” with its famous opening lines, “They fuck you up, your mum and
dad. / They may not mean to but they do.”
Or contrastingly, you may want to turn to the paradox of elegance with a
mordant tone in “Church Going” and “Aubade.”
Moving from Larkin to Collins while you’re working on the same pot of
coffee is more than stepping from darkness to light. It requires the eye to refocus and the ear to
tune to a completely different key.
There are those who turn up their nose at Billy Collins. Such affectation is the stuff from which he crafts
a counter-scold. People who do not
understand poetry’s play and fey prescience, Collins would contend, are those
who have an unrestrained need to “tie the poem to a chair with rope/ and
torture a confession out of it. / They begin beating it with a hose/ to find
out what it really means.” His “Workshop,”
is a tour de force that critiques the limits of amateur creative writing by
means of the teacher’s comments which are molded into a deft, skillful poem
that is an exemplum of showing not telling.
Next on my agenda for tandem reading are Louise Gluck and Kay Ryan. They seem to be akin to different species of
poets.
Eudora Welty, Edna Ferber, and Edith
Wharton,
J.F. Powers and John R. Powers,
Russell Banks and Richard Russo
Mary Gordon and Caroline Gordon
Harold Brodkey and Joseph
Brodsky
Frank O’Hara and John O’Hara
James T. Farrell and J. G.
Farrell
Frank O’Connor, Flannery
O’Connor, and Edwin O’Connor
Thomas Wolfe, Tobias Wolff, and
Naomi Wolf
Philip Roth and Henry Roth
. . . you’re an English major or some other form of book
nut.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home